On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 20:12 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> > > > Mar 18, 2019, 12:48 AM by ba...@ursamundi.org: > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 5:33 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > > Note that bicycle only lanes are not included in lanes tag count (only > full lanes are counted). > > > Lets fix this error by omission already. Not counting all lanes serves > *nobody*. > > Redefining lanes tag from "count of full lanes" to "count of all lanes" > while it is > used 9 million times is also a poor idea. > The premise that bike lanes aren't lanes is an inherently flawed one to start with. Up there with defining routes as a ref=* tag on constitutant ways, and yet, route relations are a thing with the need for tagging ref=* waning. The idea that this is an unfixible problem is short sighted. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
