Yup. Typo on my part. Digging some more, I have a better understanding of the tagging system. It doesn't look like holding_position:type is seeing a ton of use, and from what I can tell, it'd be more conventional and less onerous to drop "type" and go with holding_position=. I can document that in the aeroway=holding_position tag page, with links back to that page from holding_position=runway, =intermediate, & =ILS. I'm planning on using the same format as the How to Map section of waterway=dock https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddock
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:37 PM Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:14 PM Steven Estes <tapes...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sorry, I was confused. It looks the tag format would be >> aeroway=holding_position:type=runway. >> > > I think you have a typo here, in practice this would be two separate > key/value tags: aeroway=holding_position and holding_position:type=runway. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
