> for the shared name of several schools I would suggest the group relation. Just add the schools as members and add the shared name to the relation. -1 I prefer an area if there is contiguous grounds (this is a simple representation, with geographical information, close to reality, and does not involve relation). Or a 'site' relation if elements are dispersed.
> I think the school amenity may also be linked to its grounds via a relation, but [...]. -1, no need for relation, spatial data gives that information already. As you say: > The association of school with campus can be deduced from the amenity point/way lying inside the landuse area. +1000. Keep it simple. And spatial. Not over-relational. > When schools share campus make it a large amenity=school area without any name and amenity=school + name nodes for the schools. This seems very wrong to me. This goes against 1 feature, 1 element. It would prevent basic operations like counting the schools in a city. -- althio
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
