On 05-04-19 23:10, Markus wrote: > There is a minor thing, but i think that the landuse=* value should > rather be educational (adjective) instead of education (noun). This > makes more sense and fits better to other landuse=* values like > residential, industrial or commercial.
I strongly agree. However, landuse=education is already in use (~500 times), whereas landuse=educational use borders on non-existent. If landuse=education is used for the proposed purpose, than it might be easier to simply adopt it. I'll look more closely at the actual use of this tag to see if this is the case. > In my opinion, landuse=school is too specific. I am inclined to agree there too. One solution is to consider landuse=school a specific sub-class of landuse=education(al). This my proposed solution for now. Anyone not interested in the difference between the two can just treat them the same. But if it turns out that the number of landuse=school instances that aren't linked one-to-one to amenity=school is on the low side, it might be better to suggest deprecating it completely in favour of landuse=education(al). That is, the gist of the original French proposal is right, but going for the broader landuse=education(al) is a better fit for the issues it solves. I'll do some research on the actual usage to find out which way forward is sensible. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
