It's a little more than a personal note. I feel like I remember several discussions about this on talk-fr, but I didn't look for any other links that had been posted. I also don't remember if the page as updated after a thread or not. it's a several years old :)
destination is the opposite, no ? if river A go into river B : in relation A : destination=B in relation B : A with rôle tributary Le 11.04.19 à 23:37, Eugene Podshivalov a écrit : > Marc, thanks for the link. Do I understand correctly that that page is > just a personal notes page? > > Brad, imho "destination" key does not help much, because names are not > unique and if you are making a waterway network, you still have to > compare geometries. > > Cheers, > Eugene > > пт, 12 апр. 2019 г. в 00:27, Brad Neuhauser <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > Seems like this is essentially replaced by the destination key? > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 4:24 PM marc marc <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Le 11.04.19 à 12:48, Eugene Podshivalov a écrit : > > > I could not find any reference on the wiki. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Frodrigo/Relation:Waterway > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
