Le 18.04.19 à 20:29, Christoph Hormann a écrit : > you verify the information on the ground and if there is still > disagreement it is by definition something that is not verifiable > (because several mappers evaluating the situation independently > do not consistently come to the same results).
with your argument, if I disagree with the boundaries of a country, it will be necessary to remove all the nodes of the boundary except historical landmarks, border crossings and where there would be a sign because everything else is not "on ground verifiable" ? welcome to OpenPurgedMap :-) with a municipality I am working on, in one year I only found 2 historical landmarks, whereas there are 404 nodes in osm. I hope that nobody will contest the verifiable of the border, otherwise a municipality boundary with 2 nodes will be ridiculous. imho this demonstrate by the absurdity that the argument "in case of disagreement, only on-ground verifiable information is kept" does not work. it's so extreme that it's inapplicable. please come back to reality or fork a OpenGroundOnlyMap _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
