23 May 2019, 00:23 by osm...@michreichert.de: > (3) highway=footway is added to ways which are clearly tagged as area > using area=yes. Many routers route along the edges of areas but that's > more a bug and workaround than a good feature. A highway=footway area is > mapped as either area:highway=footway, not as highway=footway + > area=yes. iD recommends bad tagging. highway=service and > highway=pedestrian are the only tags where area=yes is widely accepted, > isn't it? There is no linear footway along the edge of an platform but > the whole platform polygon is the feature. > > I pointed out these reasons (not the numbers – I run my counting > programme while preparing this email) today but my request rejected. > > What is your opinion on this issue? Feel free to reply to this email or > comment at > https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6409 > <https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6409> > I always though that platform should not interupt footways, but platform itself has no need for footway tag on its area See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.06524&mlon=19.95230#map=19/50.06524/19.95230 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234100234#map=19/50.06524/19.95277
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
