That's not an example of a trick question, just a normal question with clear implications. I'd be happy to see examples of linear platform features that aren't footways and have my intuition proven incorrect.
Are there any other outdoor linear features with primary pedestrian access that aren't footways? On Thu, May 23, 2019, 9:35 AM Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 5/23/2019 12:26 PM, Nick Bolten wrote: > > I'm confused, because these two statements seem incompatible. If it's > > redundant, how can it also have a conflict like different address > > restrictions? I'd like to know how, as a data consumer, I should > > reliably interpret existing platforms without the tag added by iD. > > > > Taking a step back, can anyone name an instance where a linear transit > > platform is not a footway? > > This reads like a trick question. > > - "All platforms are, in some sense, footways." > - "So we should tag them as footways!" > > or > > - "Here's an example of a weird platform that certainly isn't a footway!" > - "Aha, interesting! Clearly this shows the necessity of tagging the > *other* 100,000 platforms as footways, to show the difference!" > > J > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
