all maxtents=yes are in a "small" area in the north of the USA. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KrR I have send a changeset comment to ask the meaning.
despite that, maxtents=<number> are indeed a bad idea. capacity:tents is a more common schema but I don't really see any advantage with tents=yes + capacity:tents=<number> versus tents=<numbers> Regards, Marc Le 03.07.19 à 10:18, Tom Pfeifer a écrit : > "capacity" is the well established for the number of items the facility > can hold, > from students in school, parking spaces to hotel rooms. > > "maxtents" is hard to understand, ambiguous and likely leading to > confusion. > It could refer to the size as well (maxi tents?) which might explain the > poorly tagged "maxtents=yes". Did you check if that came from a weird > import? > > tom > > > On 03.07.2019 02:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: >> Some users specify the number of tents or caravans allowed at a >> campsite or camp pitch with tents=<number> and caravans=<number>, but >> more frequently these are specified with capacity:caravans=<number>, >> capacity:tents=<number> or maxtents=<number> >> >> Currently maxtents=* is used most frequently and it's the shortest >> key, but there is no equivalent tag for carvans other than >> capacity:caravans=* - and also, the majority of maxtents= tags are >> "maxtents=yes" - and I don't understand what this could mean. >> >> So I'm thinking that capacity:tents=# and capacity:caravans=# would be >> the least ambiguous option, along with tents=yes/no and >> caravans=yes/no? > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
