28 Jul 2019, 11:12 by [email protected]: > On Saturday 27 July 2019, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > >> Please take a minute to review the new page >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approval_status >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approval_status> >> Thanks for creating it and submitting it for a review!
> A bit of a general remark here - the OSM wiki has for quite some time > been torn between being an attempt to document the established mapping > practice (i.e. what tags actually mean based on how they are used) and > being a way to tell mappers what tags are supposed to mean in the > opinion of those editing the wiki. > I edited Deprecated features page to be more explicit that wiki editors are documenting tagging situations, rather than ordering mappers and developers how this should be used See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Deprecated_features&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=1882964&oldid=1820343 <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Deprecated_features&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=1882964&oldid=1820343> for my changes, feedback is welcomed. > The way you present this status concept is in support of the latter - in > particular your use of the term "recommended" on status values that do > not represent a formal proposal status (that > is 'draft', 'proposed', 'voting', 'approved' and 'rejected') ultimately > means recommended by those who have dominance over editing the wiki. > I made some small changes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Approval_status&type=revision&diff=1882980&oldid=1882393 <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Approval_status&type=revision&diff=1882980&oldid=1882393>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
