sent from a phone
> On 29. Jul 2019, at 16:37, Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > > There are other historic sites embedded in the park.... are all these sites mentioned to be part of the state park, or do they simply happen to be within the boundaries? If the definition of the park is a list of areas and sites, maybe a site relation would be appropriate: you can specify a perimeter and also add stuff inside (not only polygons but also nodes and ways). If legislation said the park is made up of A, B, C, D and E, it would be comprehensive if we modeled it as an object with A, B, C, D and E as members. Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
