Am Di., 30. Juli 2019 um 14:05 Uhr schrieb Jérôme Seigneuret < [email protected]>:
> if lanes is about the total amount of marked "2-tracked-vehicle"-lanes (as > it is according to my understanding), then lanes=0 means no marked lanes. > > No simply because 2 lanes = opposites 1 forward 1 backward marked or not. > This a routing comportement. > > maybe you just can't assume in your router that the OSM tag lanes describes what you expect for lanes? > You can have 2 lanes but no mark on road. This is the case in rural France > road. Legaly, absence of marking is permit and you need fix right position > on road. > Sorry for being ambiguous, I was referring to the wiki definition of the tag lanes. I agree that there can be lanes without lane markings, observable lanes. I have to deal with the same situation in Italy. Basically what I am doing is adding lanes=2 if there are 2 lanes, even if they are not marked. ;-) Interestingly, one of those roads I was thinking of, just has gotten (or renewed) lane markings. It may often be a maintenance question, markings being renewed in such long intervals, that there are years without markings but then they might eventually return. I'm even tempted sometimes to add lanes=1.5, although these cases are better described with a width. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
