On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:54:01 +0200, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By doing that, you're basically saying that alternatives can't have > forward/backward roles. To me that doesn't make sense. We are using those > forward/backward roles to indicate that there are 2 branches for each > direction of travel along the route. This could easily happen along an > alternative part of the route as well. >
Just to be clear: are you still talking about hiking/walking routes? Or public transport? Because, as far as I know, there is no clear explanation in the wiki why forward/backward should be used in hiking routes. (except perhaps when there is a highway that is one way for foot? which is extremely rare) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
