On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:10 PM Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it is indeed complicated. But it definitely is a national park. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pembrokeshire_Coast_National_Park > and https://www.pembrokeshirecoast.wales/default.asp?PID=161 > It may include things that many wouldn't associate with a national > park, but it's a national park. Not just in name but also legally.
Oh wait a minute, it was *you* that had brought up Pembrokeshire Coast. Sorry! Richard Fairhurst also brought up the Broads as a complicated example. (He'd been cycling one summer in the Catskill Park, and approved of the 'boundary=national_park' as "quacks like a duck" even though the Catskill Park is definitely not a National Park.) >> 'If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck but needs batteries, >> you probably have the wrong abstraction.' - B. Liskov > > But we'll tag it as a duck anyway. Because this is OSM. And because mapping is a human endeavour, and humans delight in contriving things that break abstractions. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
