On 29/08/2019 15:52, Peter Elderson wrote:
LS
With the arrival of cycling node networks, the Dutch, German and
Belgian mappers decided to claim (hijack) the network value rcn for
those node networks. This exception was copied with the claim of
network=rwn for the walking node networks.
Would it be possible to try and describe in a bit more detail what has
happened, without using judgmental terms such as "hijack"? I'd start
with a link helping people understand what a "cycling node network" is.
Can you give an example of a "normal" rcn and a "node network" that
someone has tagged as an rcn and explain what the problem is with this
tagging?
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
