Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 4 sep. 2019 om 16:30 heeft Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> het volgende > geschreven: > > >> Am 04.09.2019 um 15:59 schrieb Peter Elderson: >> Thanks for the illustrations! >> >> network=* gives geographical scope (local, regional, national, >> international) and transport mode (bicycle, foot, canoe, horse, mtb, >> ski, skate, ....) > You know what I'm going to point out. > > The redundant coding of transportation kind in the the geographical > scope was a mistake, but is a done deed for cycling and hiking. BUT > there is no need to propagate repeating the mistake for every other > transportation mode, lets just stick with local, regional, national and > international these (historically I suspect that the values came from > direct tagging on ways, lcn=yes and similar). I agree with your point. Had I been around, I probably would have voted not to mix scope and mode in one tag. At the same time, the proposed tag for network configuration type does not change this, nor does it propagate it. So I would like to keep this a separate issue, and just talk about how to separate regular routes from node networks. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
