On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 12:48 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken <
> snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>:
> > Just to be clear, I'm not advocating that legal separation MUST
> > lead to
> > way separation. Just that a rule that wouldn't allow it would be a
> > very
> > bad rule. What makes most sense based upon the ground truth should
> > be
> > followed.
> 
> 
> 
> generally, in OSM the ways highway=* represent the carriageway.
> "legal separations" often are just lane markings, i.e. they do not
> constitute a carriageway, hence are not to be mapped individually
> each with their way. We have generally followed this definition,

Who is this 'we' you're speaking in behalf of?


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to