On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, 11:21 Snusmumriken, <snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com> wrote:
> > That tag is about lane changing, I don't see how it could be applied to > my example > If i understand the wiki page correctly, lanes=2 lanes:forward=1 lanes:backward=1 change:lanes:forward=not_left change:lanes:backward=not_left would mean that on both lanes it isn't allowed to turn left onto the lane of the oncoming traffic. And for the case i misunderstand that tag, we can invent a new tag. Splitting the road into two parallel ways isn't the only possible solution. My assumption is that pedestrian routing engine would stick to > sidewalks and crossings and not to tell the pedestrian to cross a > street where there is no crossing. The individual pedestrian can of > course make up his own mind what legal/physical risks are acceptable to > save a bit of time > As Kevin already pointed out, there are many places without pedestrian crossings. Therefore pedestrian routing wouldn't work where a road with painted lane separation is mapped with two ways. I wish you all a nice weekend Markus >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
