On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 23:01, John Willis via Tagging < [email protected]> wrote: > > Is "foot:lanes" An established value?
There are only 32 uses according to Taginfo and the tag isn't mentioned in the wiki. However, there are 4,450 uses of bicycle:lanes and that tag is briefly mentioned in the wiki. [1][2] I'm unsure if foot:lanes works as a alternative to pedestrian_lane or if this is only an addition for more complex situations. In any case i don't see a problem with it as opposed to sidewalk:right:kerb=no. Besides, i just realised that sidewalk:right:kerb=no could also mean a parallel footpath without kerb but with another physical barrier, like for example here [3]. [1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_lanes_and_bus.2Ftaxi_lanes [2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles [3]: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/i-yuqBv2liMpsG4mWNyiew Regards Markus
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
