Hi Martin,I would agree that water transportation is a very poor description of it, however that seems to be the least inappropriate place to put it in the hierarchical list on the wiki page for access=*. The list also includes canoe=*, which isn't really transportation for e.g. a recreational canoeist in a lake or the docks.I certainly wouldn't describe it as transportation on a wiki page for the swimming=* tag, should it progress to a successful proposal.-- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) -------- Original message --------From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> Date: 24/10/2019 09:23 (GMT+00:00) To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Tagging] swimming=* access tag Am Mi., 23. Okt. 2019 um 12:03 Uhr schrieb Robert Skedgell <r...@hubris.org.uk>:I wonder whether it would be worth adding a swimming=* access tag to the wiki and the list under "Water-based transportation" section of the page for access=* (alongside boat=*/canoe=*)? I am not opposed to the term "swimming", or using it as an access value (there are ~400 uses of it, and although "natural" is the second most used value, it isn't significant in absolute numbers),but putting it under "water based transportation" seems odd. Is swimming a kind of "transportation"?Cheers,Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
