On Tuesday, 5 November 2019, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 05/11/2019 13:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I just created https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount > > to document why it is used and why it is anyway duplicate of bicycle=no. > > > > On the page I claim that > > "In some places it is illegal to both ride and push bicycle, > > there is no good tagging scheme to indicate it." > > and I want to check is it correct. > > > ... "where it is legal to go on foot" is an important proviso. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65663472 (Meir Tunnel, dry even on a > wet Wednesday in Stoke*) bans foot and bicycle traffic, so you can > neither walk nor cycle through it. A cycle router would have to > flat-out avoid it, whereas it may choose not to avoid a short > bicycle=dismount section if it saves a long detour.
For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350458507 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23896048 Phil (trigpoint) > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > * in English football, a "wet Wednesday in Stoke" is thought of as an > occasion when a top team's star players may struggle in adverse > conditions that the home side are used to. > > > -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
