On 06/11/19 09:44, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 07:23, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:sent from a phone > On 5. Nov 2019, at 18:48, Markus <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I guess that bicycle=no almost always means that *driving* a bicycle > isn't allowed. So it seems just logical to use a new tag for places > where pushing (or transporting) bicycles isn't allowed too. Maybe > bicycle=total_ban or bicycle_pushed=no? I agree that bicycle=no has no implications for people pushing bikes,But if bicycle=no means that you can't ride a bike, wouldn't foot=no also mean that you can't push a bike ie if you're pushing a bike, you're walking, & foot=no means you can't walk, so you can't be pushing a bike?
If walking is allowed but bicycles (ridden, carried or pushed) are not allowed .. then????
Logically bicycle=no should be taken as no bicycles (ridden, pushed, carried or any other way).
Does motor_vehicle=no mean I can push one though there? I did think not ... at least not on a regular basis ...
However the sign of a bicycle with a red slash through it is usually taken as no ridding of a bicycle and normally allows dismounted transportation of bicycles. At least that is my and others use of the sign here.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
