7 Nov 2019, 18:53 by [email protected]: > On 11/6/2019 3:08 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> bicycle_pushed=no? >> >> bicycle_pushed is more clear for someone encountering it >> for the first time - bicycle=total_ban is a bit confusing >> >> Especially as in some places access for bicycles >> may be "never" (explicit "no bicycle" signs) >> or "only during extreme weather" (one of cases >> when it is legal to cycle on sidewalks in Poland). >> First case should be tagged as bicycle=no, not bicycle=total_ban. >> >> Also, it may be OK to carry bicycle in a box and not OK >> to push (not road access, but in some train you are not allowed to >> enter with bicycle, >> bit once bicycle is in a box this is considered as entirely fine) >> > > Maybe I'm missing something here but I don't see any reason why data > consumers, including the bicycle modes of routing engines, should ever > interpret bicycle=no in a way that permits walking bicycles. > > Because that is how bicycle=no tag is used (please correct me if that applies just to Poland, Austria and other countries where I am sort of familiar with used tagging). > This is exactly why we have a bicycle=dismount tag. > That is de facto equivalent of bicycle=no.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
