On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 10:56, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OSM Carto, as far as I'm aware > > - Doesn't have a concept of 2-sided embankments or a rendering for them > > Does it need such a concept? I haven't tried it when the embankment resembles an arete, but for an embankment with a plateau all that is needed is two embankments delineating the plateau. Some may want to relate them in some way, but purely for rendering they're two embankments spaced a little apart and sloping in opposite directions. I haven't tried it, but I suspect superposing two embankments facing in opposite directions would handle an arete type of embankment (such as a stop butt) with no modifications required to the renderer. > > - > - Doesn't have the concept of "on an embankment" being a modifier for > highways / railways in a similar way to "bridge" and "tunnel" > > Wouldn't necessarily need one unless the plateau of the embankment were so close that the embankment would blot out the railway or the railway would blot out the embankment. ---^---^---^---^---^ ============= ---v---v---v---v---v The usual answer here is "pull requests welcome"... > > Sometimes people might not want to do that because they know it wouldn't > be accepted (if it makes more use of lua processing than the OSM Carto > folks are happy with, for example). > Or because it is beyond the capabilities of the person who would like that feature. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging