Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > On 7. Dec 2019, at 01:51, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> I think a simple oneway=yes on a hiking route relation could say it's >> signposted for one direction. > > I would prefer being more explicit in the tag name, e.g. > sign_direction=forward/backward/both
Hm... sign direction for pedestrians is assumed both, if it's one way I would say forward is the sign direction. There is no extra information in this tag. > pedestrian_oneway=yes When applied to a walking route, "pedestrian" is implicit. > or maybe > > oneway:foot=yes Same comment. > > would be more in line with what we already have: > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=oneway oneway is mostly applied to ways, where pedestrian is not implied. For a route, the mode of transport is implied, and the tag is applied to the route, not to specific ways. > ______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
