What about routes that have oneway segments, without paths having a legal restrictions on direction of walking?
6 Dec 2019, 19:28 by [email protected]: > I think the "forward" and "backward" don't belong in a role of a relation. > Oneway=yes on a way should be enough. In the Wiki discussion it is said that > if there is one little "oneway" way in a big branch, then all the ways in a > branch should be checked to see if the whole branch is oneway. But that means > we are doing the work of a router directly in the tags. > > We should just mark "oneway" ways as such, and leave the rest to the routers. > > Also, "main" and "alternative" are orthogonal to "forward" and "backward". We > should then have "main:forward", "alternative:backward", and so on. That > doesn't make sense, and is not what "role" is traditionally used for. Public > transport routes used to use them, but not in the new scheme. > > Janko >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
