Ok, you need examples : this Eurovelo 3 is for tourism https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9351172#map=12/48.8454/2.4130&layers=C this REVe Nord-Sud is for commute/every day cycling https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8664006#map=14/48.8784/2.3599&layers=C as you can see in this video https://youtu.be/1dGtSZbUKew and this is for road cycling https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/163270#map=15/48.8577/2.2333&layers=C as you can see in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLwNlVjTOKU
mtb:scale / surfaces tags are for ways not relation. Of course nobody will blame you if you use a touristic route for commuting, and adding a tag tourism=yes doesn’t imply it can’t be used by every day cyclists. What the point? If you are a commuter you’ll focus on fast and safe route, so you’ll prefer REVe Nord-Sud than Eurovelo 3 at this place https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/48.86796/2.35391/cyclosm For instance, this information can be used for rendering map (like CyclOSM on which I work) or routers (a tourist profile routing will prefer tourism route). Le jeu. 9 janv. 2020 à 16:10, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> a écrit : > waymarked mtb routes are tagged route=mtb on the relation > waymarked cycling routes are tagged route=bicycle on the relation. > > I don't know how I could verify that a cycling route is either touristic > or for commute/everyday cycling or both. Even if advertised as touristic it > can be used for commute/everyday cycling, ande the other way around. > I do not foresee significant mapping of these purposes. > > Best, Peter Elderson > > > Op do 9 jan. 2020 om 15:08 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < > dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > >> Am Do., 9. Jan. 2020 um 10:41 Uhr schrieb Florimond Berthoux < >> florimond.berth...@gmail.com>: >> >>> tourism=yes : if the cycle route is a touristic purpose route >>> commute=yes : if it's a route for commute and every day cycling >>> >> >> >> where do you get this information from? Is it verifiable? >> >> >> >>> road_bike=yes : if it's a route to do road biking sport >>> mtb=yes : if it's a cycle route mtb oriented >>> >> >> >> to some extent the mtb=yes tag this is already covered (in greater >> detail) by presence of mtb:scale tags >> maybe it could be extended for road_bike as well (e.g. mtb:scale=-1). >> Also smoothness could help. >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness >> >> Cheers >> Martin >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Florimond Berthoux
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging