I'm also using was: because I don't care and often don't known if a poi is destroyed, dismantled, demolished, moved, the only thing I can see is that it's gone. f.e. a room whose store type has changed doesn't fit my description of disused:
Le 16.01.20 à 12:16, Dave F via Tagging a écrit : > You're using was: to represent the same meaning as disused:, so why not > use the far more popular latter one? > > On 14/01/2020 19:02, Markus wrote: >> was:shop=supermarket _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
