" A restaurant where the server fills up your bottle based on his or her humor should not be tagged as part of the refill scheme. " Maybe add a line to clarify that the sign requirement is specifically regarding schemes. A place doesn't need a sign just to have the "drinking_water:refill=yes" tag. (just so it's more clear on the page)
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 16:50, European Water Project < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thank you for your suggestion. > > I have added links in a separate section and made the criteria in the > proposal section stand out more clearly. > > best regards, > > Stuart > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 16:34, Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 15:27, European Water Project < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Andy suggests : >>> >>> "drinking_water:refill=yes" and >>> "drinking_water:refill_scheme=[scheme-name]" >>> >>> As long as two of the options for "scheme-name" can be "multiple" or >>> "yes", this alternative two tagging method seems more KISS than the one >>> being currently voted on- >>> >> >> It's better because it allows mapping places offering free refills that >> aren't part of >> a scheme (as long as the place has a sign stating it offers free refills). >> >> If you're rejigging the proposal anyway, how about providing links to the >> schemes >> you mention and also criteria for mapping (the main one being that there >> is a sign)? >> >> -- >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
