I forgot to mention that you can look at the Mapillary photos <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/tTkUGqjFadERgIGuJa1fxw> to better understand the situation.
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 23:00, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please have a look at way 41506101 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41506101> where I have used > bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes to indicate the relative position of the > foot/cycle lanes on a foot-cycle path with segregation. > Is that a good approach to map this ? > Are there better approaches to map the relative position? > NB: I would not map this as two separate parallel ways as they are not > physically separate. > > Volker >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging