I forgot to mention that you can look at the Mapillary photos
<https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/tTkUGqjFadERgIGuJa1fxw> to better
understand the situation.


On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 23:00, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please have a look at way 41506101
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41506101> where I have used
> bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes to indicate the relative position of the
> foot/cycle lanes on a foot-cycle path with segregation.
> Is that a good approach to map this ?
> Are there better approaches to map the relative position?
> NB: I would not map this as two separate parallel ways as they are not
> physically separate.
>
> Volker
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to