+1 landcover +1 on a hierarchy index and a well and a thoughtful methodology.
landuse, should describe more the use of the land. For example: A road, this include the footway, cycleway, the verge, the barriers, traffic_islands, the trees. The verge, that is a part of the use, landuse=highway, the area is area:highway=verge, landcover=grass, landcover fits in nicely. And how it is managed can be set. The hedge as, a separation between road parts, can be a part of landuse=highway, area:barrier=hedge, hedge_type=? landcover=shrubbery/or else, species. And how it is managed can be set. The hedges on traffic_island, roundabouts, is a part of the landuse=highway , is a part of a area:highway=traffic_island, is the area:barrier=hedge, hedge_type=? landcover=shrubbery/or else, species. The same for flowerbeds, etc. The apron at a roundabout. At the end all parts must be named. greenery versus shrubbery, is it the same or is the one a part of the other? hierarchy thinking. From: Peter Elderson Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2020 11:59 AM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging small areas of bushes, flowers, non-woody perennials, succulents, etc The landcover key covers this nicely. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
