> The current system seems to make sense. It makes sense but it seems that it is also much error-prone because it is easy to oversee one sentence in the wiki of Key:playground:* and Key:playground that makes the difference (pointing the case where the key should be applied)
> If you have a leisure=playground feature, probably mapped as an area, you can tag it with a list of tags like "playground:slide=yes", "playground:swing=yes", to show what equipment is available. > If you want to map a slide or a swing as a separate feature, you tag it "playground=slide", or "playground=swing" > What is the problem with this? No problem with it. This is alright. But Key:playground shouldn't combined with Tag:leisure=playground . > Re: > " I want to combine them to help to decrease tagging errors." > How will that help? What errors are you commonly finding? For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137931618 . In this case Key:playground was used to tag playground equipment on the playground object itself. But for such cases we use Key:playground:* . This is one example of many. > Re: > This would allow to map playgrounds and their equipment in situations where a playground just has one equipment and this equipment fills up the whole area of the playground. > Mappers can tag "leisure=playground" + "playground=structure" on the same node or area in this case, right? The Wikipage for "Key:playground" says the following: "It should be tagged to separate objects within the area of a playground". An exception is given with "Only when the position of the individual objects cannot be mapped yet" at the really end of the page. But for such cases where we cannot map playground equipment as an extra object we have the Key:playground:* . Cheers Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging