Problem.
The present description does not distinguish this
'*amenity=refugee_site*' from amenity=social_facility and
social_facility=shelter.
I would think amenity=refugee_site is an area set aside for the
non-temporary residential use of refugees. *
*
The meaning of 'temporary' is not stated in the wiki for
social_facility=shelter so there will be some uncertainty as to where
teh different lies.
*
*
Possibly the 'area' can be used? A**social_facility=shelter could from
the wording be considered a single structure? The 'amenity=refugee_site'
could be stipulated as many structures i.e. mare than 3?
On 14/4/20 5:41 pm, Manon Viou wrote:
Hello,
Actually RFC for refugee site location mapping started March 25,
Since this day, we received and exchanged on the proposal and made
changes to the former proposal, that’s what RFC is all about no? ,
I do not know if according to this changes, we have to restart the RFC
period?
We will restart RFC period if needed, let me know ! we haven’t
received much comments on the latest proposal modifications, please
let us know if this works for you or if amendments have to be done (
Proposed features/Refugee Site Location 2
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refugee_Site_Location_2>)
Have a great day,
Manon
Le 11 avril 2020 à 00:03, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
The minimum an RFC is required to be open is 2 weeks.
Same with voting.
On 11/4/20 1:54 am, Manon Viou wrote:
Hello all,
We have modified the proposed features/Refugee Site Location 2
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refugee_Site_Location_2> according
to discussions regarding how to best tag places sheltering refugee
and/or internally displace persons. Thank you to the contributors
who help finding a solution to have a consistent tagging in place
for refugee location.
We are now suggesting to use the tag *amenity=refugee_site *
The tag can be used alternatively on nodes or on areas:
* If the extent of the site is difficult to identify (proximity to
other villages, suburban area, etc.) it is recommended to use a
node.
* If the extent of the site can be clearly identified from the
imagery or field data collection, it is recommended to use an
area. Please note this extent does not have to match the
official boundary of a camp (which doesn’t necessarily coincide
to its physical limitations), as defined by government and
specialized agencies, for which a dedicated tag can be used.
Both approaches can be completed by mapping the landuse=residential
of the area and if appropriate a tag place (place=neighbourhood,
place=suburb, place=village) can be added in the area of the refugee
site.
Please have a look at this new proposal and share your comments
quickly if you have any. *We will close RFC period soon*.
Best regards,
Manon
CartONG- Humanitarian mapping and information management
<http://www.cartong.org>
Manon Viou
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
