If a refugee site has a well established name (and, unfortunately, there
are many examples all over the world), I don't see why it can't have a
"place" tag.
Às 18:24 de 17/04/2020, lukas-...@web.de escreveu:
Hi,
my question is whether this then rather would be something for the
"place" tag? Or did we maybe have that discussion already?
--Lukas
*Gesendet:* Freitag, 17. April 2020 um 18:28 Uhr
*Von:* "Manon Viou" <m_v...@cartong.org>
*An:* "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
<tagging@openstreetmap.org>
*Betreff:* Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Refugee Site Location
Hello everyone,
It seems I haven't been very clear in my explanations; I sometimes
have a bit of trouble choosing the right word (especially in English).
And I think the “small”/”large” discussion is going the wrong direction…
The new tag we want to propose is to map refugee camps or as it’s
seems better to say in English now : refugee sites. So we want to map
*human settlement*.
The social_facility=shelter tag is very suitable to map single or
individual building or a small group of buildings like a refugee
center, an accommodation center or a care and hosting center for refugees.
But (according to many people now) the social_facility=shelter tag is
not suitable to map refugee camps that are human settlements,
populated places where hundreds or thousands people live.
That’s why we propose to create a new value for the amenity tag :
amenity=refugee_site, to map human settlement where refugees can find
protection.
kind regards,
Manon
Le 17 avril 2020 à 13:03, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
On 17/4/20 5:29 am, Manon Viou wrote:
Hello,
According to Martin and Warin, the difference between large
and small refugee site is not clear enough,
Martin suggested to use population capacity, for instance less
than 200 people fro small refugee site,
Warin suggested to use number of square meters,
For what I have observed, small facilities sheltering refugee
(for instance: refugee centers, accommodation center, care and
hosting center, church) are not exactly what we can call
refugee site. the difference, beyond the number of building,
number of population or square meter, is quite obvious.
?? How is it 'obvious'???
I have no idea of what that 'obvious' thing is!
Is it really necessary to set a precise rule ?
At the moment there is nothing that can be used to distinguish
between the two.
Suggestion have been made on the number of buildings, number of
people and the area.
Please tell us how you distinguish between them.
I would rather suggest to share some example (like the ones
mentioned above) in order to help contributors to decide if it
rather an amenity=refugee_site or a social_facility=shelter.
Examples are fine. But there must be a statement in words of the
difference between them.
Regards,
Manon
Le 16 avril 2020 à 02:16, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
On 16/4/20 1:23 am, Manon Viou wrote:
Thanks Martin, yes, refugee sites should always be
temporary even if, as you said, some turn to be very
long term places. That's why we do not suggest to add
temporary/permanent options.
Manon
In which case the description for amenity=social_facility
+ social_facility=shelter is not correct.
If it is to be done on area then specify the number of
square meters rather than the number of buildings???
Buildings can be a of different sizes and capacities. An
area could be more consistent as to the number of people.
Imagery may not be up to date so counting buildings may
not be possible.
Le 15 avril 2020 à 11:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com
<mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
sent from a phone
On 15. Apr 2020, at 01:13, Warin <
61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I would think amenity=refugee_site is an area
set aside for the non-temporary residential
use of refugees
maybe I’m a dreamer, but I would expect all
refugee related features to be “temporary”, even
if we are talking about relatively long periods of
time
Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
CartONG- Humanitarian mapping and information management
<http://www.cartong.org>
Manon Viou
*Coordinatrice projet Missing Maps*
Email: m_v...@cartong.org <mailto:m_v...@cartong.org> |
Skype: manon.viou
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
CartONG- Humanitarian mapping and information management
<http://www.cartong.org>
Manon Viou
*Coordinatrice projet Missing Maps*
Email: m_v...@cartong.org <mailto:m_v...@cartong.org> | Skype: manon.viou
Phone: +33 (0)4 79 26 28 82 | Mobile: +33 (0)7 83889839
Address: Chambéry, France - Lon: 05°55'24''N | Lat: 45°30'20''E
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
