You are right that in case of cycling infrastructure tagged on the road (like typically cycling lanes) we need a way to indicate to which part of the road it refers, in addition to the type of haxard.
Il lun 4 mag 2020, 18:35 Jan Michel <j...@mueschelsoft.de> ha scritto: > On 03.05.20 19:16, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I would advocate a more generic approach that remains open to other > > types of hazards (there are many, unfortunately). > > A generic > > > hazard:bicycle=yes|dooring|pedestrians_on_cycleway|dangerous_exit|whatever > > I agree, but I would rather use > cycleway:(left|right|both|):hazard > 'hazard:bicycle' suggests that it is an hazard to all bicycles, but it's > more like an hazard that is a "feature" of the cycleway. Everybody close > to the cycleway is part of the hazard (whether active or passive) but > bicycles in other places of the road are not affected. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/taggingäaa >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
