In South Korea/Japan/China/Taiwan, the minimal administrative level are usually equivalent of neighborhoods, and have little to no substantial administrative functions. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3987250 this is admin_level=9 in South Korea, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5830985 this is admin_level=10 in Japan, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9230465 this is admin_level=9 in Taiwan, https://www.openstreermap.org/relation/8248082 this is admin_level=10 in China. Note that admin_level=10 also exists in Taiwan but only a few of them have already been mapped as a relation in OSM.
在 2020年5月14日週四 05:29，Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> 寫道： > At the US talk mailing list and > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:United_States_admin_level there > has been discussion about whether or not certain features should be tagged > as administrative boundaries in the States of Connecticut, Rhode Island and > Massachusetts. > > While all these States have counties, in some cases most of the government > functions have been lost, and are handled by the State (admin_level=4) or > Town/City government (admin_level=8). > > However, I have the impression that in some countries, certain local > administrative boundaries do not actually have "home rule", or the ability > to make their own laws, for example in French-infuenced areas? > > What is the minimum qualification for a boundary to be considered a > boundary=administrative with an admin_level in your country? > > -- Joseph Eisenberg > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
