May 14, 2020, 16:40 by [email protected]: > On 5/14/2020 10:01 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:48 AM Steve Doerr <>> >> [email protected]>> > wrote: >> >>> On 14/05/2020 09:31, Jo wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020, 17:44 Jmapb <>>>> >>>> [email protected]>>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Regarding the original question -- in what >>>>> circumstances are single-member >>>>> walking/hiking/biking route relations a good >>>>> mapping practice -- what would be your answer? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Always >>>> >>> >>> Doesn't that violate>>> >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element>>> ? >>> >> >> No. The route traverses the way, it's not the way. >> > > Okay. But surely this doesn't mean that every named footway or path > should be part of a route relation. > > > The bike trail that brad linked to, > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6632400> -- I've never been there but > I don't offhand see any reason to call it a route. (Brad has been there, > I assume, because it looks like he updated it 2 days ago.) There's no > information in the relation tags that isn't also on the way itself. Is > there any benefit to creating a route relation in cases like this? > > Better handling of future way splits, consistency.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
