I fully support it as outlined by Joseph.
> On Jun 26, 2020, at 12:59, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Regarding man_made=qanat versus canal=qanat, it is worth pointing out that > > qanats surface and become surface canals for irrigation and distribution. > > > Thus, it would be continuity to go from waterway=canal, canal=qanat, > > tunnel=yes to waterway=canal instead. > > Yes, that is the plan. You can also add usage=irrigation or another > appropriate value of usage=*, and width=* > > – Joseph Eisenberg > >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:12 AM Walker Bradley <walker.t.brad...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> I concur that historic or heritage should be secondary tags. >> >> Regarding man_made=qanat versus canal=qanat, it is worth pointing out that >> qanats surface and become surface canals for irrigation and distribution. >> Thus, it would be continuity to go from waterway=canal, canal=qanat, >> tunnel=yes to waterway=canal instead. Thoughts? >> >>>> On Jun 26, 2020, at 11:27, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 15:57, Walker Bradley <walker.t.brad...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> So it would seem that historic=* or heritage=* would be appropriate >>>> sub-tags for qanats when applicable on top of waterway=canal, canal=qanat, >>>> tunnel=yes. >>> >>> That's how I see it. Using historic=qanat for modern qanats seems wrong. >>> So >>> if we need different tagging for modern qanats anyway, then handle historic >>> qanats by adding historic=yes. >>>> >>>> I guess we would need to discuss after the approval of Qanat for what >>>> criterion/ia would determine historic=yes for qanat. >>> >>> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic and then discuss if it >>> needs >>> modifying/expanding to specifically deal with qanats or if the page for >>> man_made=qanat needs text clarifying what Historic means for qanats. >>> >>> If a historian, even an amateur one, is eager to visit it then it's >>> historic. >>> If a historian takes a look and says "Meh" then it isn't historic. Which >>> isn't a very objective metric, so some would say the historic tag >>> shouldn't be used at all (another good reason to prefer man_made=qanat) >>> over historic=qanat). >>> >>> -- >>> Paul >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
