Hi Michal,
I would stay with information=guidepost for those.
They serve exactly the same purpose, so they should get the same major
tag. It's only the way the sign is made that is different. You can add
the common tags like "support", "material", "location" or "colour" to
give further details about the style of the marker.
If it's really needed, we can also add another tag to specify the type
of marker. Unfortunately guidepost=* has already been taken for
something different, so one could define guidepost:type=*.
Jan
On 21.07.20 14:41, Michal Fabík wrote:
On 7/21/20 1:31 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
I've used "tourism=information; information=route_marker" for these.
"trail_blaze" is also frequently used
That doesn't sound right to me. If I understand the description on the
Wiki[1] correctly, what is tagged as "information=route_marker" or
"information=trail_blaze" doesn't carry any information other than "this
is where the path is"
What I'm talking about is the same information that one can find on a
regular guidepost (i.e. names of destinations, distances to them and
directions marked with arrows), the only difference being the "technical
implementation", so to say, i.e. metal plates screwed to a pole vs.
painting on a rock surface, among others.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
