On Tuesday 04 August 2020, [email protected] wrote: > > It's all about semantics.
No, physical geography is not. > How could I answer your question if you are not able to define what > you mean by natural=coastline? I am able to explain how i would define natural=coastline and i have already done so. What i am interested in is how you define natural=coastline based on verifiable physical geography criteria. > We must first agree on what features > we call it coastline, and then I can explain where I think it should > be drawn. But you already explained where you think the coastline should be drawn - what i would like to understand is why, in generic terms and based on verifiable physical geography criteria. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
