I agree.
Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl> skrev: (4 augusti 2020 11:26:30 CEST) >On 2020-08-04 10:06, Andrew Harvey wrote: > >> I'd suggest that if you vote no, it will be helpful for the community >if you could elaborate on why you're voting no, without enforcing a >reason as mandatory. Is it because this feature shouldn't be mapped, is >it because there is an alternative tag. So if the vote fails all this >feedback can be taken onboard for a revisal of the proposal and second >round of voting. > >The explanation should possibly have been given earlier, during the >consultancy phase? In a vote, the only thing that should count towards >the outcome is how you vote, not why you voted that way. All votes have >equal weight, irrespective of their motivation. > >However, in the ensuing inquest it is obviously useful to understand >why >a proposal was not supported by many people.. For that matter, it is >also useful to know what made people support it as well. > >Putting a proposal to the vote should IMHO not be done unless the >discussions are clearly pointing towards approval. A vote is not a >substitute for the discussion, it should be a confirmation that >consensus has been achieved.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
