Aug 13, 2020, 15:01 by [email protected]: > Here's an example [1] where the name of the tunnel seems to be tagged as > "name". I'm not sure what the roads name is (might be Schlossbergtunnel, > Hegelstraße or Rheinlandstraße). Tagging it to tunnel:name would definitely > clarify on this. > > So is there a consensus that one should tag "tunnel:name" instead of "name" > for the name of the tunnel? > If name or road and tunnel is different - yes. If name of tunnel is also name of road then name tag should be fine. > [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4834663 > > > Am 13.08.2020 um 14:56 schrieb Matthew Woehlke: > >> On 13/08/2020 08.10, dktue wrote: >> >>> the wiki states since more than eight years that there's a debate about >>> wether one should tag "tunnel:name" or "name". [1] >>> >>> Is there any new opinion in the community on this topic that has not been >>> documented in the wiki? >>> >> >> How is the tunnel tagged? If it's a highway that happens to be going through >> a tunnel (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361906432) I would expect >> that `name` is the name of the *road*, hence if the tunnel also has a name, >> it would need to be tagged in some other manner (e.g. tunnel:name). >> >> Note that my example *does* have the street name in `name`. >> >> If the tunnel is somehow tagged separately from the highway, then I could >> see that using `name` as the name of the tunnel. Of course, if the *road >> itself* is known by the same name as the tunnel, then it would also make >> sense to use `name`. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
