What about highway=footway bridge=yes layer=* bridge:structure=canopy_walkway ?
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#m_-1065115381681509086_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 23:50, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 20. Aug 2020, at 23:18, Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What's wrong with "bridge" ? > > > it’s ok, but not sufficient when you want to search them. > Maybe something like leisure=canopy_walkway or tourism=canopy_walkway (in > addition)? > Or maybe footway=canopy_walkway? highway= Footway and bridge=yes seem > essential for a basic description. > > Cheers Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
