Ah, I feel like there are certain images that might get deleted from Commons just because they don't "contribute to wikipedia articles". Maybe a special example but still: Recently mapped a construction zone for a residential area and took a couple photos. Those might not "belong on Commons" according to their moderation team.
As mentioned on the linked wiki page, you can escape a semicolon by > doubling it: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator#Escaping_with_.27.3B.3B.27 > > Ah interesting, somehow missed that. It's a solution, but still doesn't solve the problem of long urls clogging up one tag. Definitely if you have long urls because of unique hash/id's (extreme example: IPFS urls: https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmR9wseHQiLbv4AnTXACo5rQ1CEcKj2fJq6vEnuZoi6Amd?filename=IMG_20200727_172553.jpg ) Cheers, On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 10:54, bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > As mentioned on the linked wiki page, you can escape a semicolon by > doubling it: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator#Escaping_with_.27.3B.3B.27 > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:11 AM Thibault Molleman < > thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> While I use the semicolon for some other tags already, the problem with >> using it for something that has a URL. >> Is that TECHNICALLYaccording to the specification, a URL can contain a >> semicolon. >> So I feel like the use of a semicolon in a url based tag isn't a good >> solution >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 08:44 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < >> tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: >> >>> If someone really needs multiple images on one object then >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator >>> is standard. >>> >>> At the same time use for that seems dubious for this specific tag. >>> >>> >>> Aug 26, 2020, 07:41 by thibaultmolle...@gmail.com: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seems like there (still) isn't a proper tagging system to put >>> multiple images on one node/way/relation. >>> Having the ability to link other images as well would be useful I think. >>> Either via: >>> `image=url1;url2;url3` >>> or >>> ``` >>> image=url1 >>> image:2=url2 >>> image:3=url3 >>> ``` >>> That later would allow for any application that currently uses images to >>> still continue to work perfectly. >>> >>> Curious to hear your thoughts >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Thibault >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
