Yeah, makes sense.
Having ipfs be a valid image/file tag in osm would be a nice addition actually! the main use case for having multiple images on one node was for example a store, and you've just taken random images of the store (like you have on Google maps and other map apps) I do wonder if the average user is going to bother making me Wikimedia account, figuring out how commons works, and then figuring out how to make a gallery. Wikimedia also seems to kind of force you to describe what each image is, which I guess is isn't bad thing. (but I do think that a lot of images don't need more context than just having them be on the node) Cheers On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 12:38 bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. [...] > > File in use in another Wikimedia project [...] [OR] > > File in use on Commons only: An otherwise non-educational file does not > acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page > or in a category on Commons, nor solely because it is in use on a user page > (the "User:" namespace), but by custom the uploading of small numbers of > images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is > allowed. Files relating to projects or events of the Wikimedia community, > such as user meetings, are also allowed. > > [...] For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could > theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in > photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs. The > fact that an unused snapshot of your friend could theoretically be used to > illustrate an article on "Photographic portraiture" does not mean that we > should keep all photographs of unknown people. The fact that an unused > pornographic image could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on > pornography does not mean that we should keep low quality pornographic > images (see also Censorship). > > [...] Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an > educational purpose: > > Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself > and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are > plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, > such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational > even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere. > > Via: > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Contributing_your_own_work > > Some other technology (like IPFS) may also be sufficient for such party > photos and the mentioned Flickr also has a creative commons & public domain > sharing option that allows reuse for stock footage. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Flickr > > Also about uploading your party pictures as a child: you may not have > received the informed consent of all models portrayed on the picture (i.e., > your family and other customers) that you have uploaded. For example in > many countries, you must sign individual waivers if you want to publish the > photographs that include identifiable humans. This is especially true with > Commons, because the purpose of uploading is to contribute the content in a > manner which allows other contributors to edit, remix and reuse your > photographs in ways that you or your models did not anticipate. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebrity_privacy#Right_of_publicity > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_privacy > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:54 AM Thibault Molleman < > thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ah ok, I had a bunch of my images deleted that I uploaded when i was a >> kid (maybe not the smartest thing to do at the time.) >> They were birthday photos and put them up cause figured it could work as >> stock photos (remember one site actually using one of them) and they got >> deleted a couple years ago. >> (looking back on the deletion requests. Turns out they were just unsure >> what the license was. (fair enough, uploaded them when I was 12 or >> something, so probably didn't really know what I was doing). >> >> Guess wikimedia commons galleries are a good solution then. >> Maybe it should be made more clear on the wiki that this is the thing you >> should do if you want to upload multiple images >> >> Cheers, >> Thibault >> >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 11:30, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 10:04, Thibault Molleman >>> <thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Ah, I feel like there are certain images that might get deleted from >>> Commons >>> > just because they don't "contribute to wikipedia articles". >>> >>> That is not a valid reason for deletion from Wikimedia Commons. >>> >>> Commons' scope is far wider than just hosting images for Wikipedia. >>> >>> > Maybe a special example but still: >>> > Recently mapped a construction zone for a residential area and took a >>> > couple photos. Those might not "belong on Commons" according to their >>> > moderation team. >>> >>> There is no "moderation team" on Commons; deletion decisions there are >>> made by the community of contributors at large (just like edits in >>> OSM). >>> >>> Your images sound as though they would be in scope. Did you try to >>> upload them? >>> >>> Do you have an example of an image which has been deleted from Commons? >>> >>> -- >>> Andy Mabbett >>> @pigsonthewing >>> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging