Oct 17, 2020, 00:17 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 16. Oct 2020, at 10:28, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging >> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: >> >> Not in cases where >> (1) highway=cycleway is crossing road where cyclists are obligated to >> dismount >> (2) highway=footway with bicycle=yes/designated is crossing road where >> cyclists >> are obligated to dismount >> > > > in these cases the cycleway ceases to exist. Or would you say pushing only > cycleways are ok? highway=cycleway with bicycle=dismount? > Yes, in this cases cycleway is interrupted. And yes, splitting cycleway and mapping short section of crossing itself as footway is possible tagging method. Maybe superior. Nevertheless some crossings were mapped using highway=cycleway and bicycle=no on crossing nodes, probably because it is much less fiddly to map it.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
