Martin, please do not even think about deprecating a tagging that is heavily used.like highway=crossing with bicycke=no|yes|dismount I am already ignoring the frequent JOSM Warning about the deprecated crossing=island which JOSM shows me everytime I download a stretch of road that contains this tagging, not to speak of the tens of warnings of deprecated tags in bus lines, which I even don't know how to fix, that turn up everytime I my download area touches a bus line.
I also don't agree with " not worth the benefit of informing cyclists whether they have to push 4 meters or can drive on the crossing.". To the contrary, I would like the bicycle routers to inform the cuyclist about the difference nd send them preferably across bicycle-friendly crossings. Good bicycle navigation is an important issue, in the context of bike sharing, and for people who trvel with their folding bikes. Volker On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 10:29, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 18. Oct 2020, at 10:39, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > > > > Still, highway=crossing bicycle=no is an acceptable tagging (like you > can map cemeteries or parks > > or churches as nodes in the first pass, especially when there is no good > aerial imagery available) > > > my preference is deprecating this as it has too many risks, not worth the > benefit of informing cyclists whether they have to push 4 meters or can > drive on the crossing. > > I would suggest sth like crossing:bicycle=yes/no > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging