We don't seem to have a tagging currently for dedicated pickup locations in this kind of context, bus stops etc are naturally taggable), if considered really useful I don't see why we couldn't introduce a amenity=...pickup... tag.

Am 31.10.2020 um 23:50 schrieb Brian M. Sperlongano:
The use of the proposed access tagging on roads to indicate whether or not a private hire/rideshare can drive on them I think we can all agree is straightforward, but it gets muddy when talking about other types of infrastructure that this might apply to.

I would like to better understand how such access tagging would work in practice for an example at my local airport.  In that instance, the designated Uber pickup/dropoff location is a particular spot within a specific parking garage (tagged with amenity=parking + building=yes).  Do I add private_hire=designated to the building?  Okay, that can work.  But then, adding operator=Uber doesn't work -- after all, Uber isn't operating the parking garage, they just have permission to make pickups at a particular signed location. This tells me that a POI that's separate from the parking garage object is needed to indicate the precise pickup location within the garage.  Are we saying that's amenity=taxi + private_hire=designated?  That doesn't work because a taxi stand implies on-demand transportation.  I would just ask that we consider the full picture of how designated private hire/rideshare tagging should be done at airports and other transportation hubs; without that "big picture", merely focusing very narrowly on the access attribute feels incomplete.

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 4:03 PM Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:

    I think there is a bit of a misunderstanding here.

    This is not about taxi stands or anything similar, but about
    access for Lyfts, Ubers, Grabs employees to streets and
    infrastructure that they would not be able to utilize if they were
    driving for themselves (including actual ride sharing :-)).
    Example pick up and drop off access at airports and similar, this
    might include access to taxi dedicated infrastructure too. This is
    quite legit and no beef with the companies wanting to be able to
    model this to improve routing for their drivers and customers.

    Simon

    Am 31.10.2020 um 15:23 schrieb Brian M. Sperlongano:
    In the United States at least, there is a very real difference in
    meaning between "rideshare" and "taxi" services when it comes
    *specifically* to access at airports.  And I believe that is the
    intent of this proposal: how do I tag the special area in the
    airport where I must go in order to be picked up by XYZ rideshare
    company?

    At an airport, if you wish to take a taxi, you walk up to a taxi
    stand (amenity=taxi), where the taxi cabs line up, and you take
    the first taxi cab in line. This is an explicit area where only
    taxis queue up.

    Alternately, if you wish to take a "ride share", you are using an
    app to make an arrangement with a specific vehicle and driver to
    be picked up at a specific location.  In this case, airports
    often (at this point, probably "usually") have a specified
    location where such ride shares are allowed to pick up and/or
    drop off passengers.

    In some cases, the ride share pickup/drop-off locations have
    specific areas that are different for different ride share
    providers.  For example, at my local airport, due to
    disagreements about how much these companies should pay the
    airport for curb access (really), there is one location where you
    can pick up a Lyft, and a separate location 100 meters away off
    the airport property where you can pick up an Uber!

    The point here is that in the US there is a very real distinction
    between these two classes of objects, and the information someone
    traveling through the airport looking for ground transportation
    would want to know is:
    1. Is it a ride share (pre-arranged pickup) or taxi stand
    (on-demand pickup)
    2. Is it limited to only specific ride share companies?
    3. Is it pickup only, dropoff only, or both?



    On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 6:36 AM Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
    <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:

        For starters I would oppose using the term "rideshare" for
        what is a taxi/chauffeur service. It should be noted that
        there are actual rideshare organisations and services out
        there, but uber, grab, lyft etc. are not among them, they are
        simply trying to co-opt a term with positive associations for
        their operations.

        Further, real rideshare services don't get special access
        treatment anywhere I know of, outside of vehicle occupancy
        regulations, which isn't surprising as real ride sharing
        simply involves sharing costs and car on a trip that the
        driver was going to make anyway.

        If there are actual legal differences between taxi and
        chauffeur access somewhere, we could use chauffeur or
        chauffeur-driven as an access tag (better suggestions welcome).

        Simon


    ..............
    _______________________________________________
    Tagging mailing list
    Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
    <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x4721711092E282EA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to