DaveF: I don’t wish to baffle, so I appreciate your clarifications. I think we agree we don’t want “less correct” (out-of-date, etc.) data in OSM. We leave to the judgement of the Contributor whether data which are imported or curated from official sources IF those sources are of high enough quality (recent enough, accurate enough…) to enter into OSM. If they are not, don’t import them. That’s all I’m saying here. I offer you my sincere apologies if I misinterpreted you.
SteveA On Nov 17, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Dave F via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > On 17/11/2020 18:56, stevea wrote: >> >>> I've found published data (from the authority >>> authorised to amend the route) are often too inaccurate, out of date or >>> lacking in detail to warrant transferring to OSM. >> Then, don’t import, curate or transfer them to OSM. I don’t believe we want >> "inaccurate, out-of-date or lacking in detail data" in OSM. > > I'm baffled how you could completely misinterpret my comment about NOT > entering data which would reduce the quality of the OSM database. > > DaveF _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
