Results: 1 approved, 6 opposed, 3 abstained. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission
No one was opposed to the core idea of the Admission proposal, just technicalities. So we should go over them and later try again: 1. access=admisson This was the biggest problem, five voters opposed because of it. People were asking why not the more established access=customers or access=permit. I thought about access=admission to be an entrance into the admission scheme, after which the router searches for the relation. But maybe that isn't needed, so mappers can put access=customer, access=permit, or access=admission if it passes in a separate proposal. Wiki user Lectrician1 proposed access=customer + customer=admission which sounds ok for when admission is not free. 2. the word "issue" for role Three voters thought this word is strange for a place that gives you tickets or other admission tokens. They thought "issuing_place", "issuing_authority", "issuer", "ticket" or "voucher" would be better. I still think "issue" is the easiest to remember, and to combine in different tags like issue:website=*. Thanks for your comments, Janko
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
